The Hierarchy of Organizational Structures as a Reflection of Human Growth and Global Power

Organizations, like individuals, evolve through different stages of development, reflecting the journey from pain to healing to thriving. Nonprofits often provide the first point of stability for those in crisis, offering relief, healing, and empowerment. However, their existence also reveals a deeper structural reality—one that is mirrored across the global tax system, political divides, and the ongoing struggle between war and peace, control and liberation.

This is not just a conversation about nonprofits and for-profits—it is about the nature of human systems themselves. Why do we structure power the way we do? Why are some people trapped in cycles of poverty, while others build generational wealth? Why do systems of control emerge in every part of society—from global governance to corporate hierarchies to local nonprofit boardrooms?

—

To deepen our understanding of the role of organizations, we must zoom out—connecting the personal to the systemic, the micro to the macro, and the individual to the global economy.

This article explores how pain and healing manifest across the spectrum of human organization, from individual suffering to economic systems, from war economies to cooperative wealth-building, and how we might create a more liberated, sustainable world through intentional structural evolution.

The Role of Money in Organizational Structure: Power, Control, and Access

The flow of money is not just a financial mechanism—it is a fundamental force that shapes why organizations exist in their current forms. Money dictates who holds power, who remains dependent, and who can transition from survival to ownership. The structures of nonprofits, advocacy groups, small businesses, and for-profits are designed around the constraints and opportunities created by the movement of capital.

To understand why organizations are structured the way they are, we must ask:

Who controls financial access?
Who decides how money is allocated?
What barriers prevent equitable capital distribution?

Money is both a tool for liberation and a weapon of control. Its movement within and between organizational structures reveals why systems reinforce inequality or enable empowerment.

The Organizational Hierarchy: Pain, Healing, Thriving—A Mirror of Global Power

The way we organize human suffering and transformation locally is a direct reflection of how power is structured globally. Each stage in our nonprofit and for-profit journey corresponds with economic systems, political control, and cycles of conflict and liberation.

1. The Nonprofit Safety Net: Managing Pain, Crisis, and Dependency (501(c)(3))

Imagine Maria, a single mother forced into homelessness. She relies on food banks to feed her children. Years later, through a nonprofit workforce program, she learns trade skills. Today, she owns her own business and employs others like her. But what if she never had access to that first step?

Micro: Homeless shelters, food banks, crisis relief.

Macro: Global aid organizations, refugee camps, welfare systems, post-war reconstruction efforts.

At the most fundamental level, organizations that address pain exist because pain is structured into our systems.

Why This Exists: Governments and economies do not guarantee universal economic participation, meaning vast groups of people will always need relief structures just to survive.
Pain Point: People become dependent on these systems because they are not built to transition individuals into power—only to manage suffering.
Global Parallels:
- Post-war economies: Nations devastated by war depend on foreign aid, keeping them in cycles of external control.
- Tax havens & wealth concentration: The tax system allows the wealthy to avoid reinvesting in healing infrastructures, keeping crisis structures permanently underfunded (OECD Report).

Case Study: In Haiti, after the 2010 earthquake, billions in aid were pledged, yet due to corruption and mismanagement, little reached the people who needed it most. Instead, international organizations controlled the flow of resources, reinforcing dependency rather than empowerment (New York Times).

YES &: Relief without pathways to self-determination keeps people and nations dependent on external forces of control.

How Money Flows in Nonprofits

Funding Sources: Philanthropy, government grants, corporate social responsibility (CSR) funds.
How It’s Spent: Immediate relief efforts—food aid, shelters, social programs.
Barriers: Subject to donor priorities, making them reactive rather than proactive.

Why This Matters: Nonprofits are built to maintain stability, not create wealth. They exist because governments and markets fail to guarantee universal access to basic needs. Without a self-sustaining funding model, they remain locked in cycles of seeking external support, which often reinforces long-term dependency rather than transition to economic mobility.

2. Community Healing & Collective Power: Challenging Systems of Control (501(c)(4) & (c)(5))

Micro: Worker unions, grassroots activism, cooperative organizing.

Macro: Political revolutions, economic reform movements, global resistance to monopolies.

As individuals and communities stabilize, they realize their suffering is not accidental—it is often the result of policy, economic structures, and systemic design choices.

Why This Exists: To challenge who controls access to resources, who writes the rules, and who profits from suffering.
Pain Point: Power does not relinquish itself willingly, leading to conflict, political suppression, and economic retaliation.
Global Parallels:
- Labor movements challenging corporate control mirror anti-colonial struggles for national sovereignty.
- Regulation debates (should workers control their labor or should corporations decide?) reflect global power struggles over who controls energy, trade, and finance.

Why This Structure Exists: Advocacy organizations and unions exist to shift economic and policy control toward underserved groups. However, because these organizations disrupt financial hierarchies, they often struggle with sustained funding and face direct opposition from corporate and political power structures.

Case Study: The Fight for $15 movement has organized workers globally to push for higher wages and union protections (Fight for $15). Despite successes, corporations lobby against it, revealing how economic structures resist change to maintain control.

YES &: Movements without economic independence often collapse under pressure from existing power structures—leading to either violent suppression or co-optation.

How Money Flows in Advocacy

Funding Sources: Membership dues, grassroots fundraising, occasional large donations.

How It’s Spent: Organizing efforts, political lobbying, legal battles.
Barriers: Limited capital compared to corporate lobbying and PACs, making it difficult to scale impact.

Why This Matters: Money determines political influence. While advocacy groups fight for policy changes, corporations have vast financial resources to counteract these efforts. Without sustainable funding models, many movements fade or are co-opted before achieving systemic change.

3. Economic Empowerment & Small Business Development: The Shift Toward Self-Determination (501(c)(6))

After years of working for a corporate chain, Jamal launches his own grocery store with support from a local business development program. But without access to significant capital, he struggles to compete with larger retailers. His business thrives only when a coalition of local entrepreneurs pools resources to create a community-owned cooperative.

Micro: Business incubators, chambers of commerce, economic development programs.

Macro: Emerging economies, national economic sovereignty, cooperative markets.

Case Study: The Mondragon Corporation, a Spanish worker cooperative, has demonstrated how worker-owned enterprises can compete with traditional corporate models, offering a sustainable alternative to capitalist wealth concentration (Mondragon).

Why This Structure Exists: Small businesses face financial exclusion because traditional banks and investors favor established corporate entities. Chambers of commerce and business incubators exist to fill this capital gap by providing alternative funding, networking, and policy support.

YES &: Small businesses and worker cooperatives often struggle against monopolistic corporate structures, lack of investment, and regulatory barriers, preventing widespread adoption of sustainable economic models.

How Money Flows in Business Incubation

Funding Sources: Local government grants, business sponsorships, microloans.
How It’s Spent: Small business development programs, mentorship, access to networks.
Barriers: Limited capital compared to venture-backed startups, making long-term scalability difficult.

Why This Matters: Small business success is determined by access to capital, not just skill or effort. Entrepreneurs without personal wealth struggle to compete because money is concentrated in large corporations and venture capital firms. Without structures that democratize capital access, economic mobility remains restricted.

4. The For-Profit Phase: Ownership, Wealth-Building, and Systems Creation

Lisa, a successful tech entrepreneur, sells her company for millions. She now has the opportunity to reinvest in local startups that support marginalized founders. If she chooses to fund only profit-driven ventures, she risks perpetuating the same economic inequalities she once faced.

Micro: Entrepreneurs, investors, innovators.

Macro: Global trade systems, tech revolutions, world financial markets.

Case Study: The rise of Elon Musk’s Tesla, initially supported by government subsidies and tax incentives, shows how capital accumulation can shift power structures, demonstrating the thin line between state support and private monopoly formation (Forbes).

Why This Structure Exists: For-profit entities operate where money moves freely, allowing them to accumulate wealth and power. Unlike nonprofits, which are restricted by donor intent, and advocacy groups, which struggle for resources, for-profits generate revenue that can be reinvested in expansion and influence.

YES &: Without ethical investment and wealth distribution strategies, power consolidates in the hands of a few, leading to new cycles of economic disparity.

How Money Flows in For-Profit Enterprises

Funding Sources: Venture capital, private equity, public stock markets.
How It’s Spent: Growth, acquisition, market dominance, reinvestment into R&D.
Barriers: Access is limited—wealth circulates among those who already control capital.

Why This Matters: The cycle of wealth-building ensures the rich get richer. Those with access to venture capital, angel investors, and stock markets have exponential economic growth opportunities, while those outside this financial ecosystem remain locked in stagnation.

A Blueprint for Transitioning from Crisis to Ownership

Control, Liberation, and the Future of Power

Are we building systems of control or systems of liberation?

The tax system, war economies, and global financial structures shape how capital moves, who remains in pain, and who builds power.
Every policy and regulation is a question of who controls resources and whether they are hoarded or shared.

A Call to Action:

For Nonprofits → Focus on empowering participants beyond survival through economic mobility programs.

For Policymakers → Rethink tax structures and incentive models that perpetuate economic dependency.

For Entrepreneurs → Invest in cooperative wealth models and ethical funding for startups in underserved communities.

The future isn’t about choosing between control and chaos, nonprofit and for-profit, regulation and free markets—it’s about designing an ecosystem that allows people to move from crisis to ownership with dignity.

Strategies for More Equitable Financial Access

To redesign economic systems that enable mobility rather than reinforce stagnation, we must rethink how money moves across organizational types.

Nonprofits Must Transition to Self-Sustaining Models – Move beyond donor dependency by building revenue-generating programs (social enterprises, cooperative models, impact investing).

Advocacy Must Have Stronger Economic Backing – Create investment vehicles that fund social movements rather than relying on sporadic donations.

Small Business Must Have Equal Capital Access – Push for alternative funding (public banking, cooperative lending, government-backed microloans) that disrupt monopoly control.

For-Profits Must Reinvest in Economic Democratization – Shift investment priorities to fund cooperative businesses, equitable wealth distribution, and community-owned enterprises.

Money Determines Who Remains on What Step of the Journey

Money is the force behind every organizational decision. It dictates who holds power, who stays dependent, and who has the chance to create lasting wealth.

Rather than treating organizations as separate entities, we must recognize them as steps within an economic ecosystem. Without restructuring how money moves, we cannot create a world where ownership and opportunity are accessible to all.

The question now is: How do we build systems of liberation, not control — to shift financial power?

Who’s ready to build on this understanding with us? Comment below.

#SocialImpact #HybridEconomy #Entrepreneurship #SystemsThinking #EconomicJustice #PowerAndLiberation

From Crisis to Ownership: The Evolution of Organizations and the Global System of Power, Control, and Liberation